Home | Issues | Perspective | Audio | Guests | Images | Live Chat | Links | Search | About | Contact
Michael Schiavo 1993 Guardianship Hearing
"So when you made the decision not to treat Terri's bladder infection you, in effect, were making a decision to allow her to pass on?" Schiavo "I was making a decision on what Terri would want."

In 1992 at the malpractice trial Michael tells the jury that Terri is:

". . . my life and I wouldn't trade her for the world. I believe in my marriage vows. I believe in the vows I took with my wife, through sickness, in health, for richer or poor.

"I married my wife because I love her and I want to spend the rest of my life with her. I'm going to do that."

One year later, at the Guardianship Hearing (excerpted transcript below)  after receiving close to $2million from the compassionate and naive jury, he admitted he wanted Terri to die, that he melted down her diamond wedding band and engagement ring to make a ring for himself, and had Terri's cats put to sleep, not dehydrated/starved to death slowly as is happening to Terri today.

He also said that if Terri died because he wouldn't allow her to be medicated that he would have "told her parents sooner or later".

It's astounding that he would admit this in a court room at a guardianship hearing and still retain guardianship of Terri!!! He must have had inside assurance that his guardianship was rock solid.

We're posting this information in case terrisfight.org should be taken down for some reason.

March 27th, 2005. Terri is in her 9th day without water or food.

-- Jackie --


November 1993

Michael Schiavo Deposition, Guardianship Hearing

Q. What was her bladder condition?

MS. She had a UTI.

Q. What is that?

MS. Urinary tract infection.

Q. What did the doctor tell you treatment for that would be?

MS. Antibiotic usually.

Q. And did he tell you what would occur if you failed to treat that infection? What did he tell you?

MS. That sometimes urinary tract infection will turn to sepsis.

Q. And sepsis is what?

MS. An infection throughout the body.

Q. And what would the result of untreated sepsis be to the patient?

MS. The patient would pass on.

Q. So when you made the decision not to treat Terri's bladder infection you, in effect, were making a decision to allow her to pass on?

MS. I was making a decision on what Terri would want.

Q. Had the bladder condition been treated?

MS. Yes.

Q. And was...what was the reason that the bladder condition was treated?

MS. Sable Palms Nursing Home said they could not do that by some Florida law which wasn't stated.

Q. But you didn't change your opinion or your decision to not treat the bladder condition?

MS. We did change it.

Q. Correct?

MS. Repeat the question.

Q. You did not change your decision not to treat the bladder condition, correct?

MS. I had to change my decision.

Q. Sable Palms changed it for you?

Attorney Nillson Objection

Q. Okay. Is there any reason that you would not make the same decision that you previously made if the problem came up again?

MS. Repeat your question. You're losing me here.

Q. Let me be more specific. If your wife developed another condition that could result in her death, is there any reason that you would not take the position that you're not going to treat that condition and you're going to instruct the doctor not to treat that condition?

MS. I wouldn't instruct anybody, no.

Q. You instructed the doctor not to treat the condition, correct?

Attorney Nillson Objection

Q. You did instruct the doctor not to treat her bladder condition, correct?

MS. Uh-huh. Yes.

Q. If a similar...would you do the same?

MS. I'm thinking.

Q. Take your time.

MS. I probably wouldn't instruct the doctor to do it.

Q. So you've changed your opinion?

MS. Sort of, yeah.

Q. Why have you changed your opinion?

MS. Because evidently there is a law out there that says I can't do it.

Q. Is that the only reason?

MS. Basically, maybe.

Q. What you're telling me is, is that there is nothing in your belief or feelings that have changed. The only thing that has changed is the fact that you perceive the law prevents you to do what you intended to do?

MS. Correct.

Q. What did you do with your wife's jewelry?

MS. My wife's jewelry?

Q. Yeah.

MS. Um, I think I took her engagement ring and her...what do they call it...diamond wedding band and made a ring for myself.

Q. What did you do with her cats?

MS. Her cats were put to sleep n the advice of my mother-in-law.

(Note: The veterinarian who performed the euthanasia of Terri's pets came forward to say there was never any suggestion from Terri's mother that this be done and only Mr. Schiavo's insistence.)


Same Guardianship Hearing

November 1993

Q. And prior to that time, they (Terri's parents) had access to the medical records and they could talk to the physicians and the nursing home people about their daughter, correct?

MS. Correct.

Q. Okay. And after that period of time that changed, didn't it?

Attorney Nillson Objection

Q. Alright. After the altercation on February 14, 1993, the Schindlers were not allowed any information concerning their daughter's immediate condition, is that correct?

MS. The order was given not to give out any information to anybody but myself or the doctor.

Q. Okay. And what was...why was that order given?

MS. Because I figured that the nursing home was having problems, first off, with the certified nurses aids giving wrong information out over the phone, information to the family. And second of all, since my in-laws showed no care about showing up or calling me when Terri was in the hospital, I figured they didn't care.

Q. Explain that. The Schindlers showed no care about what?

MS. Terri being in the hospital in March.

Q. Are you saying that you didn't think they cared about their daughter at all?

MS. They never showed up.

Q. So the reason that they were not at the hospital because they were not at the hospital in March, you decided that they should not ever have any access to her medical records or medical treatment again?

MS. I agree.

Q. When you made the decision that you were not going to treat Terri's infection and you were going to, in effect, allow her to die, did you think that you had any obligations to tell her parents?

MS. To answer that question, I probably would have let them know sooner or later.

Q. You never did let them know, though, did you?

MS. No.

Q. When you say you would probably have let them know sooner or later, were you contemplating a certain time frame when you would let them know?

MS. I don't know what my thoughts were right then.

[end excerpt]

Taken from "Time Line" at www.terrisfight.org

Home | Issues | Perspective | Audio | Guests | Images | Live Chat | Links | Search | About | Contact