When I received the following piece it was immediately filed for the IRAQ section. It caught my attention, because I had the same thought last week.  

     How do we know the WMDs won't be planted in Iraq and then be used as a justification to have the war?  The manner in which this is written caused me to wonder if possibly the author is uninformed. There seems to be much emphasis on the party and the president, rather than a focus on the fact that the lies have been told by every administration/president regardless the party.

     In checking out the website, I noticed they refer to themselves as 'progressives'.  That has always equalled 'Communist' in my mind.

     There are just a couple of statements I believe should be cleared up.  As for the meat of this, regardless its source, it is well thought out and very possible.

     1) Bush won't be planting any WMDs and probably won't even be told when it's done (if it is done). This plan is not Bush's plan, nor is it his war.  He's a puppet and a front piece for the Zionist controllers. He's probably aware of some of the lies he tells. I've a sense, however, that -- like a mushroom -- he's kept totally in the dark and fed a lot of manure.  

     2) About his lies.  He doesn't write his own speeches, nor does he prepare his own reports.  From some other articles I've read this evening it appears the prince is being set up for a fall.  And is being intentionally made to appear more stupid than he actually is. The same creatures who are in control of the major media are of the same ilk as those guiding, assisting, and advising the president.

     The article is worth reading to see the list of lies that have been told -- and they're blatant lies.  One would think even the sleepers would be noticing that fact.  And now, we've just learned that Tony Blair presented a report that was allegedly highly-classified information and it turns out it was plagiarized from a student's essay. Colin Powell used excerpts of the report in his speech. It will be posted next.

Jackie -- February 10th, 2003   


Friday, January 24, 2003

Seeds of Destruction:

What Keeps Bush From Planting Evidence of WMD in Iraq?

     It was revealed today that the Bush Administration lied again about Iraq's nuclear weapons potential.

"When President Bush traveled to the United Nations in September to make his case against Iraq, he brought along a rare piece of evidence for what he called Iraq's 'continued appetite' for nuclear bombs.

The finding: Iraq had tried to buy thousands of high-strength aluminum tubes, which Bush said were 'used to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon.'"


"The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the U.N.-chartered nuclear watchdog, reported in a January 8, 2003 preliminary assessment that the tubes were 'not directly suitable' for uranium enrichment but were 'consistent' with making ordinary artillery rockets -- a finding that meshed with Iraq's official explanation for the tubes. New evidence supporting that conclusion has been gathered in recent weeks[.]"

     This further bloats the list of blatant lies that the Bush Administration has concocted about Iraq. To illustrate, let's take a stroll down Memory Lane.

     Remember this bald-faced lie that Bush used to terrify the citizenry?

"The International Atomic Energy Agency says that a report cited by Bush as evidence that Iraq in 1998 was 'six months away' from developing a nuclear weapon does not exist. 'There's never been a report like that issued from this agency,' said Mark Gwozdecky, the IAEA's chief spokesman."

     And how about this gem.

"Bush cited a satellite photograph and a report by the U.N. atomic energy agency as evidence of Iraq's impending [nuclear] rearmament. But in response to a report by NBC News, a senior administration official acknowledged Saturday night that the U.N. report drew no such conclusion, and a spokesman for the U.N. agency said the photograph had been misinterpreted."

     In addition, Eric Alterman noted . . .

"[Bush] has consistently lied about Iraq's nuclear capabilities as well as its missile-delivery capabilities...Bush tried to frighten Americans by claiming that Iraq possesses a fleet of unmanned aircraft that could be used 'for missions targeting the US'. [This statement is] false"

     Even the CIA admits that Bush is a liar.

"Bush's case against Saddam Hussein, outlined in a televised address to the nation on Monday night, relied on a slanted and sometimes entirely false reading of the available US intelligence, government officials and analysts claimed yesterday. Officials in the CIA, FBI and energy department are being put under intense pressure to produce reports that back the administration's line…

"Basically, cooked information is working its way into high-level pronouncements and there's a lot of unhappiness about it in intelligence, especially among analysts at the CIA," said Vincent Cannistraro, the CIA's former head of counter-intelligence."

     Let's not forget about the alleged assassination attempt on Bush Sr.

"A senior White House official recently told me that one of the seemingly most persuasive elements of the report had been overstated and was essentially incorrect," said Seymour Hersh in a 1993 article.

"And none of the Clinton Administration officials have claimed that there was any empirical evidence - a 'smoking gun' - directly linking Saddam or any of his senior advisers to the alleged assassination attempt. The case against Iraq was, and remains, circumstantial."

     And finally, Calvin Woodward of the AP documents the following Iraq lies and distortions:

1) "Publicly, President Bush's officials are touting reports that al-Qaida operatives have found refuge in Baghdad and that Iraq once helped them develop chemical weapons.  Privately, government intelligence sources are hedging on that subject, suggesting there might be less than meets the eye. "

2) Contrary to the assertion by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that Iraq kicked out U.N. weapons inspectors in 1998, Charles Duelfer, who was deputy chairman of the U.N. inspection agency at the time asserts, "We made the decision to evacuate."

3) Vice President Dick Cheney alleged that Iraq will have nuclear weapons "fairly soon."  Cheney acknowledges, and no one outside Iraq really knows how close Baghdad is to that point.

4) Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice alleged that al-Qaida operatives have had a direct relationship with the Iraqi government. "There clearly are contacts between al-Qaida and Iraq that can be documented," she said. She did not document them and a U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, indicated the evidence for linkage is tenuous, based on sources of varying reliability.

5) Bush warned the United Nations that Saddam could have nuclear weapons within a year of acquiring fissionable material. Cheney said: "On the nuclear question, many of us are convinced that Saddam will acquire such weapons fairly soon." The CIA's own forecasts have not conveyed that much alarm.

6) The administration characterizes Saddam as a supporter of terrorism generally. "Iraq's ties to terrorist networks are long-standing," Rumsfeld told Congress. Those ties are complex. One group the U.S. government brands as a terrorist outfit has been favored not only by Iraq but by many members of the U.S. Congress. That group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, advocates the violent overthrow of the religious government of Iran. It recently held a news conference two blocks from the White House.

7) The administration alleges al-Qaida operatives, including senior figures, have been in Iraq. But U.S. intelligence sources have said al-Qaida members are believed to be simply moving through Iraq en route to their home countries. They have not offered evidence these sojourners are putting down roots in Iraq, setting up camps or making contact with Saddam's government.

8) The administration, as evidence of Saddam's venality, has repeatedly noted he used chemical weapons against Iraqi Kurds in the late 1980s -- an event that barely elicited a response from Washington at the time. And one that, although known to US authorities, failed to shake US support for Iraq at the time. [See Saddam Hussein (pdf format), the book by Nita Renfrew, for details on that lie. - JP]

     From these examples, an obvious pattern appears, that the Bush Administration will lie, even transparently, in order to forward it's agenda. Such brazen arrogance and the perception that it can get away with anything (which up to this point it has) makes me wonder what would keep this administration from planting the evidence they need in order to march into Iraq uninhibited by the international community?

     Before we go there. Let's go here.

     Earlier this week it was reported that weapons inspectors have found what appear to be "man-made mounds" in a field outside Baghdad. Good God. Say it's not true!

     But alas, it is. Luckily, the "man-made mounds" seem harmless enough. I'm sure, however, that Bush was hoping for a little buried treasure in his "mounds" that would allow him to flatten Iraq and it's people once and for all.

     In fact, as I read the story, I started to wonder, "What would stop Bush from creating his own "man-made mounds"? What would stop him from planting evidence on the accused to promote his agenda? He has done worse.

     Think about it. Bush is willing to lie, cheat and steal in order to forward his agenda to destroy Iraq. To his disappointment, inspectors have found NOTHING thus far except some crated-up, 20 year-old warheads. Hardly evidence of an active program for WMD.

     The other day, as Bush was crying about Iraq "showing no evidence of disarming" and whining about allies who inhibit his Iraq-obliterating, petro-pillaging agenda, his Alfred E. Newman features turned red with rage. He was about to explode. Iraq would pay for this.

     The obvious and frightening conclusion is that Bush will do anything to seize the oil and perceived dignity that he believes Iraq has stolen from his family. It would not be going out on a limb to speculate that Bush would be willing to smuggle in some freshly produced WMD (perhaps some sarin or even a jug or two of mustard gas) made in the good old US of A and delivered through CIA outlets.

     It's actually quite simple. Plop the WMD in the ground with a noticeable "man-made mound" for inspectors to find. Have the intelligence agency inform the inspectors of the mysterious mound and let the rest take care of itself. Boom. Instant UN approval. Instant decimation. Instant $5 barrels of oil.

     I can read the press release now.

"AP - Baghdad, Iraq February 15, 2003 - Inspectors find smoking gun. WMD found in "man-made mound" outside Baghdad. Iraqi officials claim to know nothing of the weapons. 'Saddam Hussein lied to the Iraqi people and the world. He has been lying at ever stage of the game. It is clear that he cannot be trusted,' said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. One US officials said, under conditions of anonymity that intelligence suggests that plans were in the works to use the weapons on the US within the next three months." and so on.

     Who, do you think, are most people going to believe (assuming "none of the above" is not an option)?

     Again, the Bush administration has established itself as a group of shameless pathological liars. With this administration, there is nothing so outrageous as to seriously be considered a "conspiracy theory". Indeed, nothing can be put past them. They will do anything at any cost. They have shown that they care neither for the rest of the world nor for the rest of the nation. They care only for their agenda and are out only for themselves, their contributors and there cronies. If it is necessary to plant the seeds of destruction to forward this agenda, then so be it.

posted by T 11:50 AM

War with Iraq - Again?
Introduction and Overview. Reading this first will put the other items in this section into perspective. —Jackie

Hussein Did NOT Gas the Kurds!
New York Times: "The United States Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas."

Zionist Campaign for War with Iraq
In Revisionist Perspective by Paul Grubach
"Why should the U.S. go to war to serve Israeli-Zionist interests? Why should mostly non-Jewish White, Black, and Hispanic Americans — who make up the vast majority of the U.S. armed forces — have to risk their lives for the Jewish state of Israel?"

America's Ultra-Secret Weapon - "dial-a-hurt"
HPMs are man-made lightning bolts crammed into cruise missiles. The Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland has been studying how to deliver varying but predictable electrical pulses to inflict increasing levels of harm: to deny, degrade, damage or destroy, to use the Pentagon's parlance. HPM engineers call it "dial-a-hurt."

The Mother of All Wars - SHOCK and AWE
"Ullman is ready to use every kind of weapon to create shock and awe. He once said it might be a good idea to use electromagnetic waves that attack peoples' neurological systems, "to control the will and perception of adversaries, by applying a regime of shock and awe. It is about effecting behavior."

Pentagon Eyes Mass Graves (for U.S. Soldiers)
Denver Post: "The bodies of U.S. soldiers killed by chemical or biological weapons in Iraq or future wars may be bulldozed into mass graves and burned to save the lives of surviving troops, under an option being considered by the Pentagon."

View from Baghdad
This following article is the reality that 99% of the world sees about the Iraq situation and the U.S. role. This war is not over oil. It's about ownership and control of Earth's resources. . . this proven technology could provide an ABUNDANCE of cheap, clean energy worldwide, virtually overnight, if it was not ruthlessly suppressed with inventors bankrupted if not murdered.

War - No Matter What!
Dr Richard Perle stunned MPs by insisting a "clean bill of health" from UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix would not halt America's war machine. Evidence from ONE witness on Saddam Hussein's weapons programme will be enough to trigger a fresh military onslaught, he told an all-party meeting on global security.

Saddam's Bodyguard Warns of Secret Weapons
A source close to Mr. Sharon said, "Sharon intends to shatter the growing anti-war movement. He plans to call all those European leaders who are wavering . . ." Is this the ONE witness Richard Perle needed to trigger a fresh military onslaught?

Seeds of Destruction
What keeps Bush from planting evidence of WMD in Iraq?
Think about it. Bush is willing to lie, cheat and steal in order to forward his agenda to destroy Iraq. To his disappointment, inspectors have found NOTHING thus far except some crated-up, 20 year-old warheads. Hardly evidence of an active program for WMD.

U.S. Demands Iraq Show Cooperation by This Weekend
What can we make of this convoluted and contradictory piece?
The headline says 'this weekend' (2-15/16). In the body of the article we read: "Mr. Bush did not mention Friday as a turning point. Ms. Rice said he had set no deadline for action by the Security Council." Much of what we read in the controlled media is designed to 'shape public opinion' and generate fear and anxiety. Stay close with God in peace and love. —Jackie

U.S. Documents show embrace of Saddam Hussein in early 1980's
From the National Security Archive
"The declassified documents posted today include the briefing materials and diplomatic reporting on two Rumsfeld trips to Baghdad, reports on Iraqi chemical weapons use concurrent with the Reagan administration's decision to support Iraq. . . "

Book: Saddam Hussein
Click here to download Adobe Acrobat ReaderBook about Saddam Hussein, which tells a side of the story that you will not get from the major media.
Note: This link requires Acrobat Reader from Adobe.

Turkish Parliament Refuses to Accept G.I.'s in Blow to Bush
ANKARA, Turkey, March 1 - The Turkish Parliament today dealt a major setback to the Bush administration's plans for a northern front against Iraq, narrowly rejecting a measure that would have allowed thousands of American combat troops to use the country as a base for an attack.

Bush and 2 Allies Seem Set for War to Depose Hussein
N.Y.Times - 3-17-03
BUSH: "Saddam Hussein can leave the country if he's interested in peace. You see, the decision is his to make, and it's been his to make all along on whether or not there's the use of military."

Bush Planned Iraq Regime Change Before Becoming President
Sunday Herald, United Kingdom, September 15, 2002
"A secret blueprint for US global domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001...'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing.'"

Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century
Click here to download Adobe Acrobat ReaderWritten in September 2000, before George W. Bush was President, and prior to September 11th, this document is the report the Sunday Herald (U.K.) called, "A blueprint for US global domination." Among other things, the report establishes missions for U.S. military forces to:

  • "defend the American homeland

  • "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous theatre wars

  • "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions

  • "transform U.S. forces to exploit the 'revolution in military affairs'"

U.S. Awards Deals for Post-War Iraq
"A USAid spokeswoman said that the companies were chosen because of their proven ability, and that it was a policy to use US companies for projects funded by the American taxpayer." U.S. soldiers will bomb the Iraqis to hell, then the "American taxpayer" will pay, and pay, and pay to rebuild what they destroyed. Except, you can't rebuild or re-animate dead babies and men and women, not even one, nor the half-million Iraqis expected to be murdered. Oh, yes. . . the sanitized war-term for murder now is "collateral damage."

Just Another Staged Baghdad Rally?
They told us that the Iraqis were dancing in the streets, celebrating at the thought of being "liberated." Could it be they lied to us again?

Sham Saddam Scam
An analysis of the allegation that Saddam Hussein was captured.

Saddam Was NOT Captured
"The Pentagon spin machine is trying to dupe us all by telling us that this photo was taken in December. It shows two American soldiers lifting the lid off that elaborate 'spider hole', where they claim they have found Saddam Hussein."

Who Writes Letter(s) to Editors for Soldiers?
Many Soldiers, Same Letter
Newspapers around U.S. get identical missives from Iraq. ". . . appear to be part of a campaign to present a positive picture of the U.S. occupation."

Army to Recall Former Military Members
CNN News 6.29.04
"The Army is preparing to notify about 5,600 retired and discharged soldiers who are not members of the National Guard or Reserve that they will be involuntarily recalled to active duty for possible service in Iraq or Afghanistan. . . "

Pick Your Price: Your Blood or Your Soul
By John Kaminski
Demonic demagogues like Joseph Farah, Michael Savage and Rush Limbaugh all have recently recommended killing large numbers of innocent Iraqis "to teach them a lesson." . . . it's not cool to mess with Uncle Sam and mutilate his hired killers, the highly paid mercenaries he hired to assassinate Iraqi intellectuals. . . "

Thousands of US troops evacuated from Iraq for unexplained medical reasons
September 2003
"At no point in the last six months have the American people been told that for every soldier who has been killed in Iraq, at least another 15 have fallen so ill that they had to be flown back to the United States."

Back to Iraq main page | America's New War or War on Americans? | Issues Index | CDR Home