My Perspective
  by Jackie Patru 

Why Do We Do This?

Comments by Jackie Regarding Email:
"Pro-Sovereignty U.N. Ambassador Needs Your Help!!!"

From: Jackie Patru
To:  (our e-list)
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 3:44
Subject: Why do we do this? Re: Pro-Sovereignty U.N. Ambassador Needs Your Help!!!
 "Ambassador Ruddy is familiar with the U.N., and has testified about the problems and flaws in the world body.  Frank Ruddy would represent America's interests and work to steer the U.N. away from its visions of global governance.  The Bush team must appoint Frank Ruddy as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations!"
 
     Oh, my Heavens!  "U.S. Sovereignty Hangs In The Balance", and Frank Ruddy will save us.  We have met the enemy and he is us.   
     Need we be reminded that the "problems and flaws in the world body" IS that the WORLD BODY even exists?  "Steer the U.N. away from its visions of global governance"?  Have we all gone daft? 
     World War I was orchestrated by the global elite, International Zionist money-lenders to create the World Body called the UN (and set the stage for the establishment of the 'homeland').  They called it the League of Nations at that time.  When that effort failed because there were enough true American patriots in the U.S. Senate who refused to sell their souls, the same creatures orchestrated World War II, and -- through infiltration of the U.S. State Department, Congress, and Executive branch (president) by Soviet Communist Zionists, CFR, and their minions (they refer to their minions as 'useful idiots') -- shoved the United Nations down our throats. 
     And we think a single person is going to steer the U.N. away from its visions of global governance? 
     Maybe the strongest, loudest statement would be to withdraw UN Ambassadors, bring the U.S. military home where they belong, and get us the hell out of the UN.  Why doesn't DeWeese initiate THAT petition to Bush?  He appears to have the funds and 'followers' to make a big noise.  By all indications, following Tom DeWeese will lead into the abyss... it's a black hole called World Dominion by a so-called "special" and "chosen" people; and non-special and non-chosen people will not be welcomed in that world... that especially excludes Christians.
     If anyone reading this is a self-declared Judeo-Christian, go back to the New Testament.  Figure out why the Pharisees had to have Jesus killed.  He was exposing this very plan, and pointing to its source.  Geeeeze.  Beam me up, Scottie.
p.s.  How would one define a "conservative International lawyer"?
Jackie
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001
Subject: Pro-Sovereignty U.N. Ambassador Needs Your Help!!!
Folks, this is important. I just tried the Bush transition team number and it is working. The hours are 8a-8p m-f, 9a-6p sat, and 10a-6p sun (EST). I've heard that Ruddy would be a good choice and trust the source on this one. It would also be a good opportunity to see if Bush is really his own man or if his dad is really calling the shots!

Please take the minute and make the call, then forward to all on your list who have any concern.

Thanks, Dave
 
*********Sledgehammer*********
         ACTION ALERT

www.americanpolicy.org

From the American Policy Center
Tom DeWeese, President

American Policy Center
13873 Park Center Road
Herndon, VA  20171
703-925-0881
FAX: 703-925-0991
apc@americanpolicy.org

January 10, 2001

Action Alert! Action Alert!


***Bush Ponders U.N. Ambassador Choice.
U.S. SOVEREIGNTY HANGS IN THE BALANCE

The Bush administration is currently deciding who to appoint to represent the United States at the United Nations for the next four years.  The Bush team is mulling over three men, two of whom are associated with the United Nations Association (UNA-USA)-a pro-U.N. lobby group that consistently seeks to expand the United Nations' jurisdiction and power.  The two U.N. apologists being considered are former diplomat, John Whitehead, and former Democratic Congressman, Lee Hamilton.

Both Whitehead and Hamilton would be disastrous choices as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.!

The third individual being considered is conservative international lawyer and former ambassador, Frank Ruddy.  Ambassador Ruddy is familiar with the U.N., and has testified about the problems and flaws in the world body. Frank Ruddy would represent America's interests and work to steer the U.N. away from its visions of global governance.  The Bush team must appoint Frank Ruddy as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations!

CALL THE BUSH TRANSITION OFFICE TODAY!

Tell them "NO" to pro-U.N. stooges:  JOHN WHITEHEAD AND LEE HAMILTON.

Tell them "YES!" to U.S. SOVEREIGNTY ADVOCATE:  FRANK RUDDY.

BUSH-CHENEY TRANSITION OFFICE:  (202) 513-7400


***PLEASE SEND TO AT LEAST FIVE MORE PEOPLE***   [ NOT! ]
    ----------------------------------------------------------
Laughing out loud is food for our soul.  Thanks, Gary.  This did it.  (still laughing).  Sharing this with our list.
J.
----- Original Message -----
From: gary hahn
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: Definition

Jackie, Wow are you in luck... I looked up the term you referred to, CONSERVATIVE INTERNATIONAL LAWYER , in my Bro. Gary Dictionary and this is what I found:

 ( CONSERVATIVE  INTERNATIONAL  LAWYER )

* A big time wolf in sheeps clothing.

* SEE  FOOL, as in one who says there is no God.

* A mythical person much on the order of Peter Pan.

* See Trojan Horse

---- Original Message -----

From: David
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 12:55 AM
Subject: Why do we do this? Re: Pro-Sovereignty U.N. Ambassador Needs Your Help!!!]

Jackie, nothing wrong with the goal of getting out of the U.N., BUT since it AINT GONNA HAPPEN ANY TIME SOON, why not at least try to have the best representation we can have, rather than the worst? I suppose you also voted for Gore so we could just get this all over with in one fell swoop?
Nope... didn't vote for Gore.  Didn't vote for anybody.  Arsenic and strychnine are both poison.
We'll never agree on everything. I should have known better than to include you in this type of message with one of your known enemies as the source of the info. Sorry about that. I know all about DeWeese. I happen to agree with him from time to time, though, as I also do with you. Guess I thought you might let one go by for once.

Dave
Yup.  You should have know better.  As I see it, Tom DeWeese is your enemy too.  And your wife and children's enemy.  When I talked with him he sounded like a well-trained seal... agreed with everything I said, even felt my pain.  Sounds good.  The B.S. is blatant, though when we listen.   
Our minds are enslaved by their lies.  Compromise is exactly what they want. 
Even though I'm a wolf... snarling, vicious deadly wolf. I'll wear this sheep's clothing, call myself 'conservative' so you can pretend -- even though you know better -- that I'm okay.  And I'll say enough that you'll agree with, to confuse the hell out of you and even though you know better, you'll play with me. 
Take a look at the children and ask yourself what you should be doing as their father/parent.  Playing with the wolves or protecting them from the wolves?  It's your call.  Ain't it wonderful being an American where we're FREE?  or are we?  Wonder where DeWeese gets his funding?
I'm told he purchased - for $6,000 - all of Maureen Heaton's files, books, research, documents, etc. I nearly cried.  They've probably been given to Winston Smith to feed down the memory hole.

 

Perspective Main | Issues Index | CDR Home