The commentary about Biblical mythology is not a claim that the entire Old Testament is fiction. Throughout the ages, ancient truths have been hidden in plain sight, scattered among the lies; fiction is entwined with historical events. It is more likely that spiritual as well as historic truth lies hidden in religious and esoteric symbolism -- esoteric meanings for the adepts, exoteric for us, 'the profane'.

Take, for instance, the story of the exodus in the Old Testament. An important story. It is told that Jehovah ordered Moses to rescue the Israelites from their bondage in Egypt. Moses didn't think he could do that because he didn't have the verbal skills of persuasion. Jehovah was a bit miffed with Moses; however, he relented and said that Moses could take Aaron with him to be the spokesperson.

Jehovah said that Moses should tell the Pharoah to 'let my people go'; and then declared that he, Jehovah, was going to 'harden the Pharoah's heart' so the Pharoah would refuse. That way, Jehovah could prove his mighty power by bringing terrible plagues upon the people. All would suffer -- except his 'chosen' Israelites, of course. From Exodus 3:19,20 specifically, this is Jehovah to Moses:

"And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go, no, not by a mighty hand. And I will stretch out my hand, and smite Egypt with all my wonders which I will do in the midst thereof; and after that he will let you go."

In Exodus 7:1,3,5

"And the Lord said unto Moses, See I have made thee a god to Pharoah; and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. . .

And I will harden Pharoah's heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.

And the Egyptians shall know that I am the Lord, when I stretch forth mine hand upon Egypt, and bring out the children of Israel from among them."

Jehovah is depicted, then, as a god who must prove himself by causing great pain and suffering on innocent people - the Egyptians - who had nothing to do with the Pharoah's enslavement of his chosen people.

Before they left, Jehovah instructed Moses to tell the 'chosen' to steal all they could carry from the Egyptians: Exodus 3: 21,22:

"And I will give this people favour in the sight of the Egyptians; and it shall come to pass that, when ye go, ye shall not go empty: But every woman shall borrow of her neighbour, and of her that sojourneth in her house, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment; and ye shall put them upon your sons, and upon your daughters; and ye shalt spoil the Egyptians."

Could this be the reason why Jews - since 1948 and into the present - have no remorse for the eviction from their homes, along with the unconscionable, unspeakable and endless slaughter of the Palestinian Arabs, who have inhabited that 'promised' land for unknown generations? Jehovah must have changed his mind or exempted his chosen people about the 'killing' and 'stealing' prohibitions, etched in stone upon Mt. Sinai - the Mountain of The Lawgiving. 

As for all his 'wonders with which Jehovah smote Egypt'... they included:

The rivers ran with blood, the fish died and polluted the water so it stank and the Egyptians had no water to drink. Following were plagues of frogs that stank when they died, then lice, and finally flies. None of these bothered the chosen, living in the land of Goshen.

Next, the cattle all died, except for the herds of the chosen. After that, the land was covered with ashes that made boils break out on everybody, even the Pharoah's magicians - but not the chosen.

Then Jehovah sent thunder and hail mingled with fire that ran along the ground and on every living thing except in the land of Goshen, where the chosen lived. The flax and barley and herbs and fruit died. Whatever the hail didn't destroy, the next plague - of locusts - finished off the job.

After that, came three days of darkness, so dark one could feel it. All this time the Pharoah would have released the people, except that Jehovah kept hardening his heart:

"that thou may knowest that there is none like me in all the earth."  ". . . and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth." Exodus 9:14,15.

At last comes the grand finale. He sends a plague that kills the firstborn of all man and beast in Egypt, and the Pharoah, whose son was among the first born who died, let the people go. In Exodus 12: 29,30:

"And it came to pass, that at midnight the Lord smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharoah that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. . . and there was a great cry in Egypt; for there was not a house where there was not one dead."

Except for the chosen. It appears -- like his acolytes who stop at nothing to accomplish their goals -- Jehovah would go to any length to prove that he was the greatest among the gods. The end always justifies the means.

This example was used to demonstrate how probable historic fact - a world cataclysm - was woven into a fantastic story for religious adherents, who seem to have swallowed it hook, line and sinker. And let's face it, this story in Exodus is the very foundation of two religions that have swept in probably half of the people on the face of this earth: namely Talmudism and Judeo-Christianity (once called just, Christianity).

Immanuel Velikovsky, in his book Worlds In Collision, gives an entire book's worth of credible ancient historic accounts worldwide, of the same type of catastrophes that plagued ancient Egypt at that time period. In other words, it was a world cataclysm, possibly a comet that had entered the solar system and came very close to the earth.

Unless he has made up every account cited, there is a vast amount of evidence to enforce Velikovsky's theory of a cataclysm that caused mountains to melt, new mountains to appear, huge walls of water in the seas (parting of the Red Sea) to literally cover the earth, as the oceans left their beds, plagues, death and destruction on a planetary scale from what his evidence leads him to believe was a comet.

Or could it have been the mysterious Planet X that is said to be nearing the earth in its 3600-year elliptical orbit? We'll leave that one alone for lack of time and space. Velikovsky blames the destruction on a comet based on many 'eye-witness' descriptions of a burning orb, not white but blood red, and the debris rained down on earth as it came close, explaining the rain that was fire, and the 'hail' that was hot.

This has been another learning experience for me, for in the past I have rejected the entire story of the exodus as the work of madmen. Velikovsky attempts to reconstruct the catastrophe from a large number of documents.

Some of his presentation should be given here so our reader can see alternative possibilities to the events outlined in the story of the exodus. About the 'rivers running red' he says:

"One of the first visible signs of this encounter (the comet) was the reddening of the earth's surface by a fine dust of rusty pigment. In sea, lake, and river this pigment gave a bloody colouring to the water. Because of these particles of ferruginous or other soluble pigment, the world turned red.

The Manuscript Quiche of the Mayas tells that in the Western Hemisphere, in the days of a great cataclysm, when the earth quaked and the sun's motion was interrupted, the water in the rivers turned to blood.

Ipuwer, the Egyptian eyewitness. . . wrote his lament on papyrus.

'The river is blood. Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere. . . Men shrink from tasting; human beings thirst after water.'

The Finnish epos of Kalevala describes how, in the days of the cosmic upheaval, the world was sprinkled with red milk.  The Altai Tartars tell of a catastrophe when 'blood turns the whole world red', and a world conflagration follows."

Velikovsky gives many accounts of the hail, rain of fire, etc. About the 'three days of darkness', the accounts make sense, in that in the earth's approach to the body of the comet, there was a disturbance in the rotation of the earth. During that time of darkness: where the darkness lasted for several days, on the other side of the earth are accounts of the sun 'standing still in the sky' and the daylight lasting for as many days.

He mentions the many mastodons that have been found frozen in the ice in northern Siberia, with undigested grass and leaves in their stomachs and between their teeth - plants that only grow in warmer climates - proving they had been frozen instantly by a drastic and sudden change in the temperature.

In one account the sledge-dogs ate the flesh unharmed. It was said that, 'The flesh is fibrous and marbled with fat' and 'looks as fresh as well frozen beef.' Not long ago many of us watched on tv news as one of these creatures was lifted whole out of the ice.

Most relevant, to the story of the exodus and the claim that the Israelites were set apart from the devastation, is that Velikovsky says:

"Numerous rabbinical sources describe the calamity of darkness; the material is collated as follows:
'An exceedingly strong wind endured seven days. All the time the land was shrouded in darkness. . . 'The darkness was of such a nature that it could not be dispelled by artificial means. The light of the fire was either extinguished by the violence of storm, or else it was made invisible and swallowed up in the density of the darkness. . . Nothing could be discerned. . . None was able to speak or to hear, nor could anyone venture to take food, but they laid themselves down. . . their outward senses in a trance. Thus they remained, overwhelmed by the affliction'.

The rabbinical tradition, contradicting the spirit of the Scriptural narrative, states that during the plague of darkness the vast majority of the Israelites perished and that only a small fraction of the original Israelite population of Egypt was spared to leave Egypt. Forty-nine out of every fifty Israelites are said to have perished in this plague.

Velikovsky cites as his source for the above rabbinical revelation: Targum Yerushalmi, Exodus 10:23; Mekhilta d'rabbi Simon ben Jokhai (1905), p. 38. Other sources are from: Josephus, Jewish Antiquities (transl. H. St. J. Thackeray, 1930), Bk, II, xiv.5.

"The vast majority of the Israelites perished. . . forty-nine out of every fifty. . . "

A few excerpts from an entire, heavily footnoted book, cannot do justice to the author's research. To repeat myself: Unless Velikovsky has fabricated all of his sources (which I doubt is the case) I am convinced that the story of Jehovah's 'wondrous workings' on the Egyptians, leaving the captive Israelites intact, is the fabrication, using an actual event in which to wrap the lie.

The Controversy of Zion is one of the most thorough and important books I've read for an overall view of history as it pertains to our present day circumstances. The author has a gift of speaking paragraphs in a sentence, so we have the benefit of reading many books in one.  

However, contrary to Mr. Reed's comment in the above chapter where he suggested that the Law may never have been translated into Greek had the elders anticipated that 'the world would take over their scriptures as part of its own Bible (Old Testament)'... contrary to that suggestion, it would appear that the program is moving along quite well as planned.

If the Old Testament books had not been written, or if they had not been made part of the Christian Bible, Christians today would not be promulgating Zionism (God's Kingdom on Earth), and then where would the plan for World Dominion be?

It was intended - in order that the plan would succeed - that the Jews should suffer throughout the ages in order to instill pity and guilt in all non-Jews, especially Christians; and to persuade monarchies and governments to open their doors to the poor oppressed Jews. (Their 'great power of the purse', as Theodor Herzl called it, was most instrumental of course in persuading monarchs as well as the decision makers in governments.)

The Jews then, along with a built-in sense of superiority - being the chosen - are born into their state of suffering. It is a mind set, part of their religious doctrine that they must suffer for their past 'sins', and be dispersed into foreign lands. Jehovah (through Moses) said so.

On the other hand, the Jews were commanded by Jehovah to destroy their 'captor hosts' during the dispersion, whether their host nation was hostile or friendly. We shall see in Part Two how they were used in that destructive process and why they were ejected from nearly every country in which they were dispersed.

The Ancient Priesthood laid it out and played it out perfectly so billions of people (Jews and Christians) would welcome the present evil, perversion, destruction and bloodshed as the harbinger of the New World Order, believing their messiah will appear.

It is pathetically ironic that the adherents of each religion and their particular denominations proudly believe they are the only ones who will benefit when that happens. They get to live on this earth for a thousand years with their messiah ruling in love and mercy and justice, while all unbelievers will burn  forever in the proverbial 'hell'. How un-loving, selfish and self-centered. How like the murdering and blood thirsty Jehovah.  

Christians who believe they are the only ones who will make it to Heaven and that all others will go to hell, would do well to heed the words of Jesus. Rather than gloating with pride in judging that others lesser than themselves are doomed to eternal, excruciating, hell-fire:

"Love your neighbor as yourself."

Christianity is a religion which teaches today that the Jewish/Talmudic Law is Divine. Religions were made by man to subdue and control the masses of humanity.

It becomes apparent - as the lies are exposed - that the religions were created to be destroyed. I believe the expectation of the priesthood is that when the lies are uncovered billions of Christians and Jews will throw the baby out with the bath water and embrace their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion' that they are 'preparing for the world'.

It is hoped that as the lies are peeled away and the Spiritual consciousness of bewildered and betrayed masses awakens, they will 'see' and 'hear' and 'know' the simple truths given us by the one called Jesus.

If one takes time to study the teachings of other spiritual teachers, like Prince Sidhartha (the Buddha), Mohammed, Krishna, etc., the basic foundation of all is very similar to the simple truths given by Jesus, such as:

Love your God with all your mind, and heart and soul; love your neighbor as yourself. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. As you sow, so shall you reap. By their fruits you shall know them. By your words you are justified and by your words you are condemned. With God, all things are possible. Nothing shall be impossible unto you. I and my Father are One; He is in me as I am in you. The kingdom of God is within you. You are the Light of world. The truth shall make you free.  

The word 'religion' comes from the Latin, 'ligio': to bind, to tie. The 're' means just that: to re-bind. It would be safe to say that the above mentioned maxims are not being taught in any of the respective religions today. Throughout history, the Priesthood has gained control of the students' minds, made a 'god' of the teacher, created a religion around that teacher while twisting, distorting and hiding the truth. In time the distortions became 'truth' to the religious adherents, binding them to the priests manipulations which cast the believers into the darkness of ignorance.

All religions have shreds of Truth running through them, and for the most part the Truth has been a closely held secret of adepts and initiates to the Mystery Schools. If, as Jesus said, the "Kingdom of God is within" us - and that his Kingdom "is not of this world"... why then do Christians so eagerly await the coming One World Government? 

Plato said that the 'elite' have always given the masses their religions, cultures and morals. Think about it... did Jesus say he was here to start a new religion? Actually, he is quoted in John 18:37 to Pilate:

"... To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice".

We are told that the Romans gave us the name 'Jesus.'  However, according to Dr. Israel Shahak, in his Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97-98, 118, we read:

"The Hebrew form of the name Jesus--Yeshu--was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, 'may his name and memory be wiped out,' which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as 'Herzl Jesus' and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as "Nasser Jesus" and more recently 'Arafat Jesus." --Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.

In the case of Jesus' real name, maybe the truth lies somewhere in between. When we wake up to the lies that were promulgated by the 'church' in order to re-gain control of the people under Roman rule; when we realize that the protesters who broke away from Catholicism brought the majority of the lies right into the new Protestant re-ligions along with the Old Testament; when we accept the fact that we were all born into a lie and truly begin to ask, seek and knock the truth will be revealed.

If our reader is offended by the reference to the second coming as a 'myth', I highly recommend Charlie Samples work, The Greatest Hoax. Christians who subscribe to the 'every word the word of God' axiom will find that, according to the scriptures, the apocalypse prophesied in Revelations, and talked about by Jesus took place - as Jesus foretold -in that generation.

If there is a 'coming apocalypse', as described by Velikovsky, and if peoples of ancient civilizations have left behind the accounts of such, it would be safe to assume that the priesthood had knowledge of that when the 'prophecies' were written into the 'Holy Books' of the various religions -- written by the same priesthood.

That same group who orchestrated Jesus death 2,000 years ago is the same group in power today. If he did return the 'mob' would no doubt be stirred up against the 'false prophet' - as he would probably be labeled - and cry out for his death. . . again.

That mob in the U.S. today demands the slaughter of innocent men, women and children in Afghanistan, or anywhere, to avenge the tragic deaths at the WTC allegedly masterminded by a man of whom it was said early on by U.S. Senator Oren Hatch:

"They've [FBI) come to the conclusion that this looks like it may be the signature of Osama bin Laden; that he may be the one behind this".

That's enough for Christians to justify wholesale murder in the name of God. It has become clear that the priesthood's uncanny understanding of human nature uses its knowledge to enslave our minds through the various religions they have given us. They have seduced the world's billions into believing that War is a 'Godly' deed.

In their arrogance the ultimate goal is to capture or imprison our souls. If the maxim is true that 'the mind is the gateway to the soul' we should all ponder that possibility seriously.

Although Christianity was created around the teachings of Jesus as told in the New Testament, the Old Testament does seem to take priority as 'the authority' for the majority of those who call themselves Christians. WHY?

Why do Christians quote so heavily from the Old Testament, skip over the Gospels - including the statements in red print which are presented as direct quotes by Jesus - and quote the allegedly reformed Pharisee, Saul/Paul as the authority?

And how is it that the O.T. is so heavily laden with all the 'begats' from the very beginning of time (the priesthood declared they knew the exact day and time that the world was created) and why is it we know so little about the life of Jesus, who was here only 2,000 years ago?

Think about it. The priestly records of bloodlines were said to have been destroyed in 70 AD when the temple was demolished, and yet in the Old Testament from those six-thousand years ago we are given a rundown on generations of 'begats', including the begotten in incest:

Abraham married his half-sister, which would make Sarah both the mother and aunt of Isaac; Moses' father married his aunt, thus Moses great aunt became his mother. Lot's daughters got pregnant by their father after they got him drunk, so they gave birth to their own brothers... or would that be half brother?

That scenario sounds like an echo of the escapades of the gods and goddesses as told in ancient mythology, doesn't it?

However, when it comes to the life of Jesus we know so little; his birth, the flight to Egypt to escape Herod's wrath, the day in the temple and then a few pages depicting his ministry.

What gives? What did Jesus do while in Egypt? What did he discover? And what did he do during those years before he began his ministry? Are we to believe there are no records to shed light on this mystery? In the last verse of John it was stated,

"And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen"

So, where is it? Why do we know so little about what happened during the time of Jesus' birth, his growing up years, and the 'many other things which Jesus did'? This was recently explained away by a very dear friend: 'it says in the Bible we were given enough to understand'. When asked if what we had been given was enough for her, she said simply and finally, 'yes'.

My question has always been: Why have we been given so little and why do Christians not question, when Jesus himself told us to ask, seek and knock?

Seek ye the truth and the truth shall make you free.

It has been written from many sources that the Catholic church archives holds (and hides) thousands of documents written by the ancients. The Dead Sea Scrolls remained hidden from all but seven theological scholars for over half a century after their discovery. What changes, additions and deletions were made before they were released to the public little piece by pieces?

And what power exists that claims the right to control this critical historical information, considered sacred by many? From several and varied sources we have read that the Vatican, the Rockefeller Institute and Israel, in their turns, have had possession of the Scrolls, held secret from the hundreds of millions of people who hunger and thirst for Truth -- this researcher/seeker/ writer being one of those.

Maybe the answer lies in a Time Magazine article we recently discovered, of January 14, 1991, titled, Ouster of an Anti-Judaist.

It seems the Dead Sea Scrolls are housed in the Palestinian Archeological Museum (also known as the Rockefeller Institute). A Harvard Professor, John Strugnell, who had held the position of chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls for several years was fired because of an interview with the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, in which he purportedly called himself an Anti-Judaist, and declared that

"Judaism is a 'horrible' religion with 'racist' origins that in principle should not exist at all."

It might be presumed that after several years work on the Scrolls he would be in a position to know. Strugnell, who denies being anti-Semitic also asserted that:

"The correct answer of Jews to Christianity is to become Christian." 

In today's Orwellian, Judeo-Christian world, that would certainly be akin to jumping out the frying pan and into the fire. Did you notice the position Mr. Strugnell held? Chief Editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls. An editor edits! According to the 1974 Merriam-Webster dictionary, 'edit' is a verb meaning 'to revise and prepare for publication'. 

It is worth repeating that the first five books of the Old Testament in the Christian Bible make up the Torah, which is the foundation of the Babylonian Talmud - the holy book of the Jews.

Those first five books of the Christian Bible lay out the political program for World Dominion, to be governed by the same Ruling Sect that set the plan in motion before Jesus was born, and to be governed solely by Talmudic Law. Rabbi Rabinovich's statement that:

"The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach..."

is referring to the same political program and the same Ruling Sect of which Jesus spoke 2,000 years ago when he opposed the laws made by men rather than Creator and when he told the Pharisees "...Ye are of your father the devil".

Jehovah, the tribal deity presented to the people 3,000 years ago by the itinerate priests, was the 'devil' of which Jesus spoke. To put it another way: According to the Old Testament, the Levitical priests were Pharisees. The Pharisees were the priests of the god, Jehovah. Who, then, would be their 'father', if not Jehovah?

According to the Old Testament, Jehovah himself says he is 'a' god. From Exodus 6:2,3,7

"And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD: And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JE-HO'VAH was I not known to them...

And I will take you to be for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God..."

Does that sound like a statement that would be made by the One Creator of all that exists? "I will be to you a God"? What possibly could this mean? That Jehovah is not the God of which Jesus spoke? Our Father in Heaven, who loves us? In Exodus 15:11 we find an interesting inquiry of the Israelites asking Jehovah,

"Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the Gods?"

'Among the Gods', would seem to imply multiple gods, Jehovah being one of the many. Solomon in II Ch. 6:14 praises Jehovah, saying:

"O, LORD God of Israel, there is no God like thee in the heaven, nor in the earth..." 

If Jehovah is the One God/Creator, why do his priests and his chosen people keep comparing him with other gods? Jesus is also quoted, in John, to the Pharisees:

"If God were your Father, ye would love me; for I proceedeth forth and came from God; ... Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar and the father of it."

It would be interesting to discover if Jesus actually used the word 'God', or was his word for Creator mis-translated to once again cause the confusion? It makes it difficult for Christians who have fed from the Pharisaic trough for so long to differentiate the two in their minds; especially difficult in the face of constant admonishments by religious leaders and the Bible itself to not question, yet Jesus told us to ask and seek and knock.

To confirm the statements of the Rabbis, above, regarding the 'religion of the Jews', in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, page 474 we read:

 "The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature"

A guest on the Sweet Liberty broadcast informed us that Jupiter/Jove/Jehovah were one and the same. A search on the internet (using 'Jove' and 'Jehovah') brought astounding results. (All emphasis in these excerpts are added)

The first item on the list was: A Masonic Song - 'A performance of this song in New York City was reported in Gaine's Mercury, July 2, 1781':

[verse 1] "By sacred influence hurl'd, From chaos rose the world, Great will of Jove. Grand architect supreme, Fountains of wisdom stream, Receive our humble theme, Duty and love.

[verse 3] Jehovah we implore Peace to his realms restore . . ."

It was stated that this song was sung to the tune of 'God Save the King', which is the exact tune to which Americans sing 'My country tis of thee; sweet land of liberty...' Oh, my... have we been duped!

Another reference to Jove/Jehovah was titled '666 in Ancient Religions'. The explanation of a group of symbols, signs, and codes stated in part:

"...The Hebrew-Chaldee JHVH (Jehovah forming the crossbar of the H could also be translated JOVE, a minced form of Jehovah and a name of the sun-god Jupiter."

Here are the first two verses of The Universal Prayer, by Alexander Pope, once again using Jove and Jehovah as the same:

"FATHER of all! In every age, In every clime adored, By saint, by savage and by sage, Jehovah, Jove, or Lord!

Thou great First Cause, least understood, Who all my sense confined To know but this, that thou art good, and that myself am blind . . . "

Other information from several varied sources discovered in the search for Jehovah/ Jove/Jupiter and Minerva is excerpted below:

'According to an ancient legend, the first man was made by Zeus. His breastplate was the aegis, his bird was the eagle. In Zeus' honour, the Olympic games are held every four years.

... essentially the same 'inflation' of the leading god happened with Greek and Roman religion: Greek Zeus and Latin Jupiter or Jove.

Dzeus or Deus Pater... in Latin Deus Pater meaning 'God, the Father'.

At the end of, and especially after, the much later 'Babylonian Exile' of the Jews, the Jews. . . inflated a local god of the Palestinian soil, Yahweh, into a Jew-choosing divinity.'

Zeus was the name the Greeks gave the Lord of the World. The same god in Rome was Jupiter or Jove. Jove-Jehovah's symbol was the EAGLE. Is it not interesting that the symbol for the U.S. is the eagle?... and Bush dubbed the neverendingwar on terrorism Operation Noble Eagle - ONE - from the United Nations' slogan "Out of the many - one". In Latin it is : "e pluribus unim", which slogan we find on the 'dollar' bill of the Federal Reserve Bank.

"The Jews have long written the vowel-less Tetragrammaton YHWH (for YaHWeH) with the added Masoretic points of the Hebrew-Phoenician word which they actually pronounced Adonai, meaning 'Lord' which gave rise to the name 'Jehovah'."

"Thus, what was originally a transpersonal universal intelligence underlying and constituting all existence became a very personal Middle Eastern despot who paradoxically also loves you. It was the alpha-male/father raised to infinite magnitude."

" With the goddesses Juno and Minerva, Jupiter formed the triad whose worship was the central cult of the Roman state."

"In the council of the gods that followed the overthrow of his father Saturn, Jupiter (Jove) was crowned Sovereign Lord of all the World and of all the gods."

Jupiter formed the triad - trinity?

Jupiter/Jove had overthrown his father because he felt Saturn to be inadequate to the work - Lucifer?

Jupiter/Jove was crowned Sovereign Lord of all the World, and of all the gods - Jehovah? And the people asked of Jehovah:

"Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the Gods?"

It is fitting here to repeat earlier excerpts from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

"When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned it is these same hands [the mob] which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance thereto."  Protocol No. 3.

"Ever since that time [French Revolution] we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favour of that King Despot of the blood of Zion, whom we are preparing for the world." Protocol No. 3.

"However, it is probably all the same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion." Protocol No.4.

How would Christians accept the fact - if they realized it - that their churches are teaching Babylonian Talmudism? It is true. The Jewish religion is not Judaism; there is no such religion as Judaism. The Jewish religion is Talmudism, and as it is today, it traces its descent without a break through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Judaism is not a religion, it is a Law, religionized. Wouldn't it be a more accurate term then, rather than Judeo-Christian to call it like it is: Talmudic-Christian?


Previous PageNext Page